6/8/2023 0 Comments Metoo task coach14:08:52.365 -06:00 Epicor10Test: Processing loop for purging task history has started. 14:08:52.365 -06:00 Epicor10Test: Processing loop for purging reports has started. Using verbose logging I found that the task agent service is polling continuously at a high frequency for a schedule to process. This should be more than enough to figure out what is going on. Specifically, you will see what schedules/tasks are started and when they finish. This will give you a huge amount of information. If that is not enough, you can bump the verbosity of the log by editing the C:\Program Files (x86)\Epicor Software\Epicor Task Agent Service 3.2.500.0\ file and change: This will give you an idea of what is going on. It didn’t run long since the “weighted average” is very small. In the above “ExecutingTasks=” means a maximum of 1 task run over the interval. The values in square brackets are the minimum, maximum and weighted average since the last metrics were written. Basically, you get all kinds of information about what Task Agent is doing internally. Metrics (ExecutingTasks=, QueuedTasks=, TaskTimes=, TasksFinished=2, ExecutingSchedules=, SchedulesFinished=2, LongestRunningTask="00:00:00.0511008", LongestWaitingTask="00:00:00") The one to look at first is the new “metric” data. Open it and you will see a bunch of information. Your log files will be there with dates in there name. Paste that into Windows Explorer and it will automatically figure out what %ALLUSERSPROFILE% is. %ALLUSERSPROFILE%\Epicor Software Corporation\ICE TaskAgent Service\Logs That sure is a lot easier, isn't it? Unfortunately, it does the opposite of good.In 10.2.500, we added a bunch of extra logging information to the Task Agent’s log file. Sadly, some people would rather cast stones at all men - and cast all women as victims. I would hope that it encourages women and men to stand up and call out perpetrators by name. In an ideal world, I would hope that #MeToo helps people speak up and fight back. #MeToo has already received a fair share of criticism, for everything from trivializing sexual abuse - the blanket hashtag fails to discriminate between a "me too" for a catcall and a "me too" for sexual assault - and the standard complaint about social media, which is that it's all talk and no action. A girl hanging out with a boy, the article declares, "may well not know how to say no, or that she is allowed to say no." Therefore, it continues - and I'm summarizing here - we should not focus on encouraging girls to speak up and say no, but rather teach boys that girls don't really know how to say no. When it comes to helpful tips - like "Three things that decent men can do in response to #MeToo" - the United Kingdom's Independent, a British online newspaper, takes things up a notch, managing to insult boys and girls at the same time. Is she suggesting that bad behavior is not really bad? It's so confusing, but I suppose most binaries are.) "This binary, which is inherently juvenile and oversimplified, evades the reality that our culture raises all men with toxic ideals about masculinity, and that we all share responsibility for ending the misogyny that makes so-called 'bad' guys do 'bad' things." (Note: I do not know why the second "bad" is in scare quotes. "There's truly no such thing as a 'good' or 'bad' guy," writes Leah Fessle, a reporter at Quartz at Work. It's a system of oppression in action." (You probably needed only one guess.) (Hint: It is not the inherent sinfulness and fallen nature of human beings.) She continues: "It's patriarchy. What does factor in? I'll give you three guesses. Because I am big on gender equity, I should clarify that I darted away because he was clearly disturbed, not because he was a guy. Sure, I've been catcalled a few times, and I once had to dart away from a clearly disturbed guy on the streets of New York City. That's right: In a world stocked with predatory males, I have had good male teachers, good male professors, good male bosses, and good male friends who are normal human beings with operating empathy sensors and competent command of every basic human emotion. Well, get ready to be shocked: I cannot honestly say #MeToo. Writing in The New Yorker, staff writer Alexandra Schwartz noted a comment a friend of hers posted on Facebook: "Genuinely curious if there are women who have never been sexually harassed." Schwartz doubted that could possibly be the case: "I'd be overjoyed, and shocked, if the answer to my friend's question turned out to be anything but an unequivocal no." In the hostile world that women face, we are now told, Weinsteins lurk around every corner. At least that's how it feels in the social media fog in the fall of 2017.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |